Allowance by Age Chart: How Much per Year, 6 to 16

An allowance by age chart is the question most parents arrive at before they arrive at the question they actually want to ask, which is "what number do I write down for my own kid this Saturday." The chart is the spine; the conversation around it is the lesson. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Money As You Grow milestones lay out the developmental side of this, and the Building Blocks model confirms the school-age years are when financial habits and norms get set.

Below is the chart, year by year from 6 to 16, with the dollar amount, the recommended save / spend / give split, the system that fits the year, and the milestone that bends the curve. Pick the row that matches your kid; pick the column that matches your household budget.

How to read the allowance by age chart

A useful allowance by age chart does three things at once. Most parenting blogs answer the first one (weekly allowance by age, scaled to a budget) and skip the other two, which is why parents end up with a number and no system.

1. How much per week at that age, scaled to your household budget tier (Tight, Comfortable, or Flexible).
2. What split of save / spend / give the kid should be running, and how that split moves as they get older.
3. Which system carries the money (unconditional weekly drop, hybrid with earnable extras, or mostly earned), because the system is the half of the answer that determines whether the dollar amount actually teaches anything.

Drag the age slider in the chart below to see all three for any age. Tap a tier to re-fill the chart for your household. The number you see is calibrated against the matching per-year deep-dive post, so the chart and the year-specific guides agree.

The chart's three columns matter. Tight is for households where the allowance has to fit inside a real weekly budget; the smaller number is intentional, and predictability at a small amount produces planning behavior better than a bigger number that gets skipped on hard weeks. Comfortable is the standard $1-per-year-of-age starting point and the column most parents will land on. Flexible adds a small premium for households with room, and is most useful when the kid is saving toward a real stretch goal in the next quarter.

The $1-per-year rule (and why it bends)

The $1-per-year-of-age convention is the most quoted starting point for kids allowance by age, and the rule of thumb most parents already know when they sit down to compare allowance amounts by age. It is roughly right for ages 7 through 13. A 7-year-old at $7 a week is a defensible weekly amount. A 12-year-old at $12 a week is, too. The rule is easy for both kids and parents to remember, easy to bump on a birthday, and aligns reasonably with the Money As You Grow milestones for school-age kids and preteens.

What the rule does not do is hold at the ends. At 6, the dollar amount is almost beside the point; the chart starts at $3 to $6 a week because the lesson at this age is the cadence and the ritual, not the cash. A 6-year-old who gets three coins on Saturday and sorts them into three jars has learned more than a 6-year-old who gets $6 in a single bill and puts it somewhere. The amount is a prop. (Our deep dive for age 6 walks through this in more detail.)

The rule also bends at the other end. A 15-year-old at $15 a week is fine on paper, but most 15-year-olds are about to start earning real income. A real paystub from a 12-hour-a-week job at around $14 an hour lands closer to $145 a week after withholding, almost ten times the chart amount. At that point, allowance is either a small symbolic supplement or it goes away. By 16, the chart amount is closer to zero than to $16.

A handful of years in the middle (roughly 7 to 13) is where the chart matches the rule cleanly. Above and below that range, the household budget tier and the developmental milestone of the year do more work than the digit.

Save / Spend / Give changes with age

The split column of the chart matters as much as the dollar amount. A three-jar split (Save, Spend, Give) is the structure that turns money into a decision-making system instead of a single pile, and the right ratio between the three is not the same at 6 as it is at 13.

At 6 and 7, the chart sits at roughly 33 / 33 / 34 (an even three-way split). The point at this age is to practice the act of splitting at all; the ratio matters less than the ritual. A kid who learns to drop one of three coins into each jar before any decision about buying anything has internalized the order of operations that produces savers.

By age 8 the chart shifts to 40 / 40 / 20: save and spend grow toward equal, give compresses slightly. By age 10 the conventional 50 / 40 / 10 split lands, and most preteen lessons are written around that ratio. By age 12, the start of the identity-money years, save holds at 50 while spend gives ground to 35 to make room for a bigger give percentage. (For why the 12-year-old shift is bigger than the others, see the deep dive; it is the year the conversations about clothes, hobbies, and "what everyone else has" enter the chart.)

By 14 the chart settles into 55 / 30 / 15, and by 15 it lands at 60 / 30 / 10. The trajectory is consistent across the years: save grows steadily with age, spend gives ground, and give holds at a small but durable percentage. Older kids are working toward longer-horizon goals, so a higher save rate matches the math of what they actually want. Give does not need to scale with age; the habit forms early, and a consistent 10 percent is more honest than a manufactured 20.

The OECD's PISA 2022 financial-literacy results found that students whose families talked through money decisions scored higher on financial literacy and saved more. The split is what makes that conversation easy to have every week.

Which system goes with which age

Three systems, three different lessons. The right one for an age 6 kid is not the right one at 13.

The chart picks the system that fits each year. Briefly: unconditional weekly at 6 and 7 because the cadence is the whole lesson; hybrid (small base plus earnable extras) from 8 through 13 because it teaches both rhythm and effort without making basic family participation feel pay-to-play; mostly earned by 14 to 16 because real work is the next move and the chart should not get in its way. The full systems theory (what counts as a paid chore, where the line is, what happens when you switch mid-year) lives in the pillar guide at /allowance-for-kids.

Lessons that teach the chart in practice

The chart is the map; the in-app lessons are how kids walk it. The four below cover the three age bands the chart spans (young, preteen, youngteen) and tie the chart's central mechanics (cadence, saving first, monthly planning, real goals) to short interactive lessons that take 4 to 8 minutes each.

The first lesson is the youngest-band introduction: what a payday is, why it arrives on the same day every week, and why one of three coins goes into each jar before any of the rest gets spent. The second lesson is the preteen heart of the chart: pay yourself first, before any other allocation, before any decision about what to buy. The third is the early-teen monthly plan, which is the right shape once a real paycheck (or a hybrid with substantial earnable extras) starts to land. And the fourth ties any age's chart to a real savings goal with a real horizon.

When should you start giving an allowance?

This is the question we hear from parents more than almost any other about allowance, and we get why. The chart starts at age 6, but the first year is the one that needs the most context, so it is worth pausing here before you set the number for your house.

Our honest answer is: 6 for most kids, sometimes 5, rarely earlier. The marker is not really a birthday; it is whether your kid can recognize coins, can sit through the ritual of sorting them into three jars, and can wait through a week between paydays without melting down. Most 6-year-olds clear that bar. Some 5-year-olds do too, especially the second-or-later kid in a family who has already been watching an older sibling do it. (For the year-one specifics, including why cash beats apps at this age, see the 6-year-old deep dive.)

A few signals that suggest you can start earlier than 6: your kid asks where money comes from without prompting, identifies coins by name, or stays focused on a small task for at least five minutes. A few that suggest you should wait a year: meltdowns over small frustrations, no interest in the concept of "later," or a household where the rhythm of payday cannot reliably be held weekly because of work schedules. The cadence matters more than the calendar age. Hold the weekly drop steady, or wait a year and hold it steady then.

What changes when the chart bends at 14 to 16

The chart's right edge looks different from the rest of it, and that is the point. By 14, most kids can hold a monthly plan instead of a weekly one, and the smart conversation shifts from "what do I spend it on this week" to "what does this whole month need to cover." By 15, a real job is on the table for many kids: babysitting, retail, food service, tutoring, lifeguarding. The chart sits at $15 to $20 a week, but the real number in a 15-year-old's pocket is usually a multiple of that from earned income.

By 16, the chart amount is closer to symbolic than to substantial. Most families either drop the weekly allowance entirely or keep a small base of $5 to $10 a week as a household-participation signal, and route real money through a paycheck instead. The 16-year-old deep dive covers the bills-and-insurance phase-in (phone, gas, car insurance, sometimes a piece of streaming) and why this year is the right year to start it.

The bend in the chart is not a failure of the chart. It is the chart succeeding at the thing it was set up to do, which is to walk a kid from coins-and-jars at 6 to paystubs-and-budgets at 16. If your kid hits 16 and the chart still looks like the 12-year-old row, the chart did not do its job. If it bent on time, it did.

Frequently asked questions